(Passive or active exposure to development/value-add)
Not all investment funds are deeply resourced in hands-on property development capability—especially where exposure is passive, programmatic, or diversified across assets. Yet development and value-add transactions behave differently to stabilised assets: assumptions move, timelines slip, costs escalate, approvals become contested, and counterparties reprice risk fast.
Propertywise supports funds by applying repeatable underwriting discipline: credit-style narrative, explicit assumptions, downside framing, and governance that improves certainty.
We also bring sponsor-side realism—how projects behave in delivery—and transaction-side discipline—what buyers and partners discount.
Common fund pain points we solve
We help funds move faster with better underwriting and cleaner execution pathways bridging the gap between “investment thesis” and “delivery reality”.
For Land-owners who are the beneficiary of rezoning and require guidance on how to best capitalise on this windfall for themselves from an unbias development team that works for you.
Propertywise supports licensed investment funds with development underwriting, due diligence governance, credit-style packaging, structuring support, and transaction execution discipline—so deals are approvable, fundable, and deliverable.
Yes. We underwrite development and value-add opportunities using a sponsor, transaction or credit committee lens—stress-testing planning, cost, time, exit and controls
It’s a decision framework that makes assumptions explicit, frames downside first, tests sensitivities (time/cost/value), and documents mitigants, controls and decision gates suitable for IC and lender scrutiny.
Yes. We can produce IC-ready deal notes: thesis, risks, mitigants, sensitivities, conditions, governance, and key “must-confirm” items.
Yes. We build tailored development DD checklists and data room indexes aligned to asset type (residential, industrial, mixed-use, value-add) and stage (pre-DA, DA, construction).
By identifying the few variables that break outcomes (planning friction, program slippage, cost escalation, valuation basis changes) and structuring controls + mitigants early.
Yes. We support underwriting and risk framing for senior debt, mezzanine/stretched senior, and preferred equity-style structures, focusing on downside protections and enforceable controls (with legal advisers).
Yes. We support construction-stage governance: cost plan logic, contingency controls, program credibility, drawdown mechanics (high-level), reporting cadence and risk triggers.
We model and narrate sensitivities across time, cost and value/income, including combined downside cases, then map practical mitigants and decision gates.
Because assumptions don’t survive real delivery conditions: approvals delays, scope drift, escalation, weak contingency governance, and capital terms that don’t tolerate change.
Yes. We review sponsor capability in practical terms: delivery approach, controls, reporting discipline, decision cadence, procurement logic and risk management.
Yes. We create repeatable underwriting scorecards so deals are assessed on the same basis—risk, time, evidence quality, controls, and exit realism.
Yes. We can run portfolio-level risk segmentation, identify hotspots, and propose action plans around cost-to-complete risk, timing and exit pathways.
By packaging the deal in a form IC expects: clear assumptions, downside framing, evidence gaps, mitigants, and a clean “decision required” recommendation.
Yes. We can coordinate scope and sequencing so third-party inputs arrive in the right order and remain consistent across feasibility, planning and credit narrative.
Yes. We build CP roadmaps and trackers that align deliverables, owners and timelines to reduce late-stage friction and slippage.
It’s a clear register separating verified facts from assumptions—critical for defensible underwriting, reduced disputes, and faster counterparty approvals.
Yes. We support transaction discipline: data room readiness, Q&A governance, offer comparison frameworks, and process sequencing to reduce fallovers and retrades.
By removing uncertainty early—credible narrative, clean diligence, controlled process—and ensuring assumptions are evidence-led and consistent.
We don’t replace licensed valuers. We provide commercial underwriting and feasibility logic that improves valuation readiness and reduces assumption mismatch.
Yes. We help underwrite rezoning/density uplift opportunities by mapping pathway credibility, time risk, and what sophisticated counterparties will discount.
We bring crossover discipline across sponsor execution reality, credit decision logic, and transaction execution—so advice holds up under scrutiny and delivery pressure.
No. We provide commercial advisory and packaging support and work alongside your legal/tax/licensed professionals.
Common models include: rapid deal triage, full underwriting memo + DD roadmap, capital/structure support, monitoring/reporting cadence, or transaction execution support
Book a call. We’ll triage the opportunity, identify the key gating risks, and outline the minimum evidence required to proceed with confidence.
Office 3, Level 1, 12 Churchill Ave, Strathfield NSW 2135, Australia
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.